| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 534 |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4065 Posts |
I took a chance on this MS66FB Mercury dime. The TrueView image showed an interesting pattern on the D mint mark. 1943-D has a known D-over-inverted-D variety. The leaf position didn't match on the mint mark, but I figured that if someone accidentally punched one upside down RPM, they could have easily punched two. After examining under magnification, I think that this is just a die gouge mixed with some radial flow lines. However, I wanted to put it out there because 1. I think it's worthwhile to show that sometimes you strike out when variety hunting, and that's normal, and 2. it's always wise to get a few second opinions before deciding that a coin is ordinary.     Full resolution TrueView image: https://www.pcgs.com/cert/50869670 |
 Newly listed items on eBay by Brandmeister. View all Brandmeister's items on eBay.
 |
|
Moderator
 United States
32709 Posts |
Your first close-up really does look like a RPM. Woulda fooled me (which is really not that hard to do as I'm still learning...)
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
13258 Posts |
RPM or not it is still a beautiful coin.  with Spence - had you showed that close up alone I would have said D/D RPM. Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.artToo many hobbies .... too much work .... not enough time. |
|
Moderator
United States
157664 Posts |
Quote:
1. I think it's worthwhile to show that sometimes you strike out when variety hunting, and that's normal, and 2. it's always wise to get a few second opinions before deciding that a coin is ordinary. Very interesting example, thank you for sharing!  Quote:
RPM or not it is still a beautiful coin. Indeed. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5716 Posts |
Appears to be it, Stage C judging from the pictures, also has the same die crack near the wing tip. Excellent pick up!
|
|
Moderator
United States
157664 Posts |
Quote:
Appears to be it, Stage C judging from the pictures, also has the same die crack near the wing tip. Excellent pick up! That settles it for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7082 Posts |
Very nice RPM D/Inverted D Southeast. FS-501  Edited by Chase007
02/13/2025 7:01 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
157664 Posts |
Nice images, Chase! |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4065 Posts |
Are you sure? When I compare it to the three examples on PCGS, I see some subtle differences. I put a certified version on the right, it's the middle coin from this PCGS page: https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin...pm-fb/929308First, the D on my coin is shifted considerably left. Look at the gap to the stem. Also look at where the leaf tip is relative to the left edge. On mine, it looks inside the edge. On the certified version, it is to the outside. Second, the position of the inverted D seems much higher up on the certified version. Third, the obverse die crack seems to be at a slightly different angle. I know that Die Deterioration can really change surface features. I also know that slight variations in camera angle can seemingly change where features appear to be relative to each other. Can this really be FS-501?   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6369 Posts |
Looking at your last close up pick, I feel like you have an RPM but it is definitely not FS-501 the location is not close and I see no matches on VV or Wexler. It would be a nice one to send in, congrats!
-makecents-
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7082 Posts |
Quote:
Are you sure? I neglected to compare the MM location and sure enough it is not a match to FS-501 MM location but it is a D/Inverted D Southeast
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5716 Posts |
I also agree it is a D over inverted D southeast, perhaps a slight die rotation that cause this variation? Send it in as suggested.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6369 Posts |
Quote:
perhaps a slight die rotation that cause this variation? I do not understand this statement. A rotated die would have absolutely nothing to do with the mm placement or where the die markers would be. They are on the die, they would not move out of conjunction with the devices.
-makecents-
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5716 Posts |
You are right makecents, the mint mark was punched into the working die.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4065 Posts |
If I were to send it in, where would I send it? VV, Wexler, CONECA, somewhere else? Do the attributers even evaluate coins in slabs?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5716 Posts |
Perhaps going to the FUN show or one of the bigger coin convention will have few booth of expertise there that can help in evaluating.
Wexler's IMO is one option I would approach in sending to get attributed if getting to these bigger convention isn't a option, it isn't expensive, cost more to ship and insuring the coin, website detail coin examination service, it only indicate loose coins but nothing about evaluating coins in slabs which you have to inquire.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 534 |
1978 EISENHOWER DOLLAR EXACT COIN ADDITIONAL COINS SHIP FREE IKE1978P005
1978 EISENHOWER DOLLAR EXACT COIN ADDITIONAL COINS SHIP FREE IKE1978P004
1978 EISENHOWER DOLLAR EXACT COIN ADDITIONAL COINS SHIP FREE IKE1978P003
1978 EISENHOWER DOLLAR EXACT COIN ADDITIONAL COINS SHIP FREE IKE1978P002
1978D EISENHOWER DOLLAR EXACT COIN ADDITIONAL COINS SHIP FREE IKE1978D001
Posted 02/13/2025 1:29 pm
