| Author |
 Replies: 139 / Views: 60,455 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 India
1982 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
Jahangir issue from Ahmadnagar   |
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
Burhan Nizam shah-3 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
Please see this coin.  This is peculiar because of two reasons. 1. The date. Shown on the coin is "968".Muhammad shah ruled from AH.867-887. That makes 968 impossible for his period.Actually the date "869" is written retrograde. 2. Usually such coins of Muhammad shah have a line above the date and below sultan. This coin does not show that.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
Another Bahmani coin, of Humayun shah with full name of the issuer with overlay.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
Another Jahangir issue from Ahmadnagar.   obv. "(Jaha)ngir" bad(shah) and numeral "7" below horizontal line. Rev. zarb"Ahmad nagar" above horizontal line and "sanah 4" below. The legend arrangement is different because usually "Ahmadnagar" is seen on the lower part and Jahangir on the upper, above the vertical line on the middle of the coin. Here on this coin, name of the ruler is on the lower half of obv and mint name is on the upper half of the rev. Now about the date. With "7" on the obv, the possibilities are AH.1017,1027 and 1037. Goron and Goenka says that Jahangir issues of 1017 with legible date are found. No later dates are so far known of Ahmadnagar for him. So it is AH.1017. The date "4" on the reverse can be 4,14 or 24. RY-4 of Jahangir falls in AH.1017. It can thus be presumed RY.4. So this issue should be of AH.1017, RY.4 of Jahangir. I have so far not seen any Jahangir issue of Ahmadnagar with regnal year. |
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
I have to make a correction to the above post of Ahmadnagar coin AN.S#019-a with apologies.
There are two possible rulers who could have the combination of RY.4 and AH.date ending in 7. They are Jahangir and Farukhsiyar. With an erred reading of "ngir" before "badsha", I jumped into the conclusion it is of Jahangir.It was pointed out by another expert and now the confirmation has come from another expert. That coin is an issue of Farukhsiyar in AH.1127, RY.4. Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
32709 Posts |
OK thx for the clarification. These pages are super-valuable!
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
A tiny Half Gani coin of Muhammad shah-I (1359-1375.CE). This variety is illustrated as BH#40 in Coins of the Indian Sultanates of G&G where that coin is of slightly higher weight and is a doubtful Half Falus. This coin weighs 1.69gms and corresponds to the weight standard for Half Gani. Moreover, date is partially visible on this coin. "7" is off-flan with "60" seen above "abd". That makes the date 760.AH.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
A small denomination coin of Ahmad shah-II.On its obv., name of the ruler is struck. On the reverse, "zill allah" legend can be seen.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
Here is a coin of Muhammad Adl Shah, BJ028, G&G.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
India
1982 Posts |
A rare variant of Kalimulla Gani.   |
| |
Replies: 139 / Views: 60,455 |
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 10/03/2016 3:15 pm
