| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 842 |
|
Valued Member
Italy
199 Posts |
Edited by joe_77
08/14/2024 12:45 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
130 Posts |
Keeping it in the holder will be an additional motivation for the PCGS grader to keep the currently assigned grade.
So, I guess it depends on what you want to accomplish:
If you are concerned that it may grade lower- keep it in the holder
If you are looking for a higher grade- take it out.
I actually agree with the current grade and would expect the same.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Italy
199 Posts |
Thanks you both for your help! Quote:
Keeping it in the holder will be an additional motivation for the PCGS grader to keep the currently assigned grade I never tried to crossover so I have no first hand experience. I read PCGS graders might implicitly lean towards downgrading so this sparked the doubt on whether to submit raw or not. Obviously a higher grade would be welcome but at the same time it was not my primary concern. Submitting raw was more to make sure the crossover is not bias. I can live with an MS62 in PCGS holder but at the same time it would drive me nuts imagining it was downgraded just because I put on the form something lower than MS63 to make sure it crossovers (which is paramount for me since I want the coin in a PCGS holder). Thanks in advance for your guidance! |
|
Valued Member
Italy
199 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
157722 Posts |
I agree with the advice given. Nice looking example.  |
|
Valued Member
Italy
199 Posts |
Hello everyone! Good news today! I ended up following your advice and did a crossover without specifying a lower minimum grade (and without cracking it out), so it was either a MS63 or nothing. Just got word from PCGS that the crossover was successful!  Thanks all  |
|
Moderator
United States
157722 Posts |
Outstanding!  |
|
Valued Member
Italy
199 Posts |
Thank you jbuck! Here's PCGS TrueView (plus a little of my editing).  |
|
Moderator
United States
157722 Posts |
Quote:
Here's PCGS TrueView (plus a little of my editing). Looking good!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
15758 Posts |
That's an absolutely fantastic coin, joe 77 - congratulations!
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Valued Member
Italy
199 Posts |
Thanks again jbuck & Hondo  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5995 Posts |
Just curious, why did you want it in a PCGS holder?
|
|
Valued Member
Italy
199 Posts |
Quote:
Just curious, why did you want it in a PCGS holder? It's mainly because I dislike the NGC holders with a passion and have all my coins in PCGS ones. Then.. if I want to find more reasons: I trust a PCGS grade more than an NGC one, I believe it demands a larger premium all other things being equal, the pics taken are better, etc.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5995 Posts |
Ok, I have something like 200+ slabs. Only 2 are NGC The rest are PCGS, and a couple some Canadian guy gave me, that really aren't slabs at all. |
|
Moderator
United States
157722 Posts |
My complete graded IKE set is PCGS, although I have four extras that are NGC. I do like the PCGS holders more.
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 842 |
Posted 08/14/2024 3:30 pm
