Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Ken's Numismatic eBay Store US and World Coins, Bullion, and Exonumia. Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall
Subscribe to our Youtube Channel! Check out our Pinterest!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

Help Needed In Identifying A 1692 Stag Head Token

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 2,108Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
daltonista's Avatar
United States
824 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2024  12:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add daltonista to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


I feel your [pain, Landyman, having spent a few years, like PaddyB above, working to attribute what turned out to be a obscure "manorial token," that circulated on the grounds of a tiny family-owned estate encompassing no more than a couple of square miles in Kent.

One of my more helpful resources has been the "Heraldry of the World" website, where the gentleman who maintains this wiki will even answer individual questions to help identify civic and organizational crests, escutcheons, arms, etc. He helped me narrow my token down to a family name and county, and then I managed to gently impose on a couple of local museums, churches, and libraries to come to my rescue. Please note that e-mail correspondence with multiple sources over a period of many months was required -- no instantaneous results.

With respect to your token, I just did a quick search on "stag" and came up with several hundred blazonry citations. That's a hot link, so you can check it out easily from here. (Just click on the "500" at the bottom of the page to show all the references at once.)

Almost forgot: You can try WorldCat.org to see what library near you has a copy of Mitchiner for you to look at. (I'm actually finding it on the shelf in Perth and Brisbane!) That's Jetons, medalets and tokens: British Isles circa 1558 to 1830, by Michael Mitchiner. There's an e-book edition available via HathiTrust.org, but I believe that's permitted to circulate only in the US.

Hope you'll keep us all posted...interesting mystery token!



I never pay too much for my tokens...but every now and then I may buy one a little too soon.

Edited by daltonista
01/18/2024 12:39 pm
New Member
Australia
25 Posts
 Posted 01/19/2024  10:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Landyman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you to all for your comments and suggestions and apologies for this long post. I will add further images in a separate post.

january1may - I initially thought the 'wave' was a coiled rope often seen beneath family crests but on further examination it is only evident to the lower right of the stag head and appears to be a later dent from a heavy strike (perhaps a hammer miss-hit when punching the hole.)

paralyse - I originally purchased the token as a colliery ticket (my area of interest) so that is still a possibility. After my earlier research drew a blank I moved away from that as a probability so thank you for pulling me back out of the rabbit hole I had fallen into!
The barrel stave marker is an interesting idea to add to clues but the two-sided design and reeded edge would suggest something other than a marker.

daltonista - thank you for your support - I am still enjoying the chase! I also have an example of the manorial token you are referring to (I*H together with bear arms and crescent) but at least there are several known examples of that token. I have another mystery token for another discussion (same as D&W 298/175 numbered 23) - again, several examples are known. The references you suggested are very useful - using 'stag head erased' narrows the search to a more manageable number many of which can be discounted due to being a more recent grant. If it does represent a family crest, then the best of the rest from that source suggests either the clan Fraser of Lovat (but that stag head erased normally rests on a coiled rope) or one of the Clare families of Ireland.

Further observations after detailed examination in various light conditions and scans in colour, B&W and negative:
I find the style of the "1" in the date intriguing given the simple and somewhat crude forms of the 6, 9 and 2. The "1" is more gothic in appearance.
The die axis (obv/rev rotation) is 180 deg and the later damage to the obverse has largely obliterated the upper design of the reverse but there appears to be something between the upper pair of acorns that, with a lot of imagination, could be a cross/star meaning the lower decoration (two acorns with a cross between) may be repeated above the date.
I note that in reflected light (image in my next post) the acorn above the "2" could be interpreted as a four or five petalled flower but that may just be an imprint of whatever the token was sat on when damaged.
Finally, I recently found the collector's ticket that came with the token - I thought it had been lost but was only misplaced. The token is from the collection of Emyr George and purchased via a Simmons Gallery auction in 2021. It was listed as "Mining?" (hence my interest). The old ticket clearly shows that Emyr thought it was an early mining token and reads "Early Mining Ticket" "Unpublished (?)" and "CF D&W p295 NL No 145 (1750)". The back of the ticket has a note "cf A H Baldwin File seen 5 4 88" (or possibly "5 + 88"). I'm not sure the D&W reference will help as 'Tickets and Passes of Great Britain and Ireland' is not illustrated. However, I have recently purchased a copy (still waiting for it to arrive.) I'm not sure about the Baldwin reference - does it refer to the previous owner's file of Baldwin auction sales or perhaps a reference to Baldwin correspondence files?
New Member
Australia
25 Posts
 Posted 01/19/2024  10:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Landyman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Images to add to my previous reply




Pillar of the Community
daltonista's Avatar
United States
824 Posts
 Posted 02/09/2024  7:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add daltonista to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Sorry I'm just catching up...I could have gotten this D&W citation to you weeks ago!

It's hard to imagine why someone would have written up that ticket for your piece....

Have you been able to make any progress?



I never pay too much for my tokens...but every now and then I may buy one a little too soon.

Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
paralyse's Avatar
United States
12041 Posts
 Posted 02/09/2024  9:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add paralyse to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You could ring up Baldwin's and see if they've got catalogues from 1988.

Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890

"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
New Member
Australia
25 Posts
 Posted 02/09/2024  11:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Landyman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks paralyse and daltonista for your ongoing interest and help.

The reference to the unicorn token in D&W with its further note to "Walker, I & T. See Broughton" (Colliery?) is strange. The colliery was only leased to John and Thomas Walker for 14 years from 1823 (ref. Finlay, The Mining and related tokens of West Cumberland). I have examples of a Walker I & T token dated 1834 (Finlay 80) and that token has no similarity with the stag head or unicorn head tokens.

However, Broughton Colliery did issue (issuer John Lamplugh) trade tokens circa 1665-1670 in response to a shortage of coinage at that time. Apparently locally-issued token coinage of halfpenny and farthing denominations, although strictly illegal, became commonplace with "many thousands of issuers" (not helpful!) and tolerated by the authorities. A royal proclamation of 1672 forbade the further use of such tokens which adds a further question about the numbers (date?) on my token - 1692.

I will be travelling to the UK later this year and will make contact with Baldwins to see where that leads. I will post any findings on here.
  Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 2,108Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.35 seconds to rattle this change. Forums