Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,259data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfab4/dfab41809e4de5f50ee942d5574c36612a94307a" alt="Next Topic Next Topic" |
|
New Member
United States
23 Posts |
Received this in a trade for a 1938D Walker (AU53) - any Thoughts on grade? AU53? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/332c9/332c9b0e2e367edd81f474ff6c5909ab7c8acd0f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9d74/c9d7404fd05ff817f2bbb43cc522f0ef46e4facc" alt=""
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
33743 Posts |
Easy AU-55 with a shot at 58.
|
Valued Member
United States
331 Posts |
am I missing something or was that an incredible deal for you
|
Moderator
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ad9e/9ad9e4e0a325662502f7227251406cc18ca1c0ed" alt="Learn More... Learn More..." United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: am I missing something or was that an incredible deal for you
You're missing that 1938-D is a Key Date, the third-lowest mintage of the entire series behind 1921-P and 1921-D. Of course, that only narrows the gap - this Half Eagle is worth at least 50% more than the Walker is and jcra80 traded with somebody who must have wanted that Walker really bad. I'd give $300ish for an AU53 1938-D Walker. If I had the money (I don't data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c43a1/c43a1fc3f0fbd0393b56aca5157314e9f50adc6e" alt="" ), I'd throw $400 at this Half Eagle right now, based only on these pics. It's absolutely no worse than AU55 and I'm not positive it's actually circulated at all.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
I would've done that deal in a second
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
604 Posts |
Quote: I would've done that deal in a second data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd7b/dfd7b6e4b9cb2ddfd69cfce7d9f8e27abec098b6" alt="" Looks like you got a good trade. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/534a0/534a042b9f158fb36cf486e981a83c3051f90047" alt=""
|
Bedrock of the Community
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ad9e/9ad9e4e0a325662502f7227251406cc18ca1c0ed" alt="Learn More... Learn More..." United States
94367 Posts |
Good deal. I'd say this is a 55 at least.
|
Bedrock of the Community
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f1c8/3f1c878af40c5338ee5472559a7e559f081eddb6" alt="Learn More... Learn More..." United States
17393 Posts |
I'm with the AU55 group. Nice
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
Either AU-55 or 58 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e05d1/e05d182371d0a43181ca083f2e3a1f92dede0d11" alt=""
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10786 Posts |
I'm assuming you paid $100+ and the '38-D Walker for that gold piece. It does look AU and is easily worth $400 as previously noted.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I think the coin could grade MS-62, maybe 63 on a good day. The cheek, feathers, and fields look fully lustrous to me without the dark, dull surfaces and disturbed mint luster that I usually associate with wear.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
No traces or signs of wear, maybe on the chin but I'm not certain, so don't quote me on that.
Looks better than my '61 1907, so I'm at a 62 maybe a 63.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1764 Posts |
|
|
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,259data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfab4/dfab41809e4de5f50ee942d5574c36612a94307a" alt="Next Topic Next Topic" |
|