@ghostrider:
Quote:
To your knowledge, is there any way to compare the figures that you relate here to the last years half dollar coin.
To estimate the current profit, we'll need to make a few assumptions...
First, we'll assume that the cost to produce a copper-nickel commemorative half-dollar is the same as what it would cost to produce a standard copper-nickel Kennedy half-dollar.
The last official cost figure released by the US Mint (that I could find) pegs the cost to produce a half-dollar at $0.1511. That figure is several years old (2005), however, so let's add about 20% to it and call the cost $0.18 (estimate based on actual inflation calculations).
We need to account for the cost of the commemorative coin's packaging which, considering the simple packaging for the half-dollar, shouldn't add more than about $0.15 (likely less) to each coin.
Combing the two cost components, we can estimate the total cost for a 2011 US Army half-dollar at approximately $0.33.
The 2011 Army half-dollar cost $15.95 during the pre-issue period and $19.95 thereafter.
We need to remember the surcharge being collecting on the sale of each Army half-dollar in our calculations -- it was $5.00.
So, using the pre-issue pricing first, the Mint could see a profit of roughly $10.62 per coin ($15.95 - $5.00 - $0.33) -- a profit of about 3,218%; using the standard issue price of $19.95 yields a profit of about $14.62 per coin or a profit of approximately 4,430%.
These numbers are likely high as I don't have a good way of estimating the cost of overall advertising that was allocated to the 2011 Army half-dollars or knowledge of the costs associated with administering the coin's surcharge distribution. In any case, however, the US Mint's current profit on producing a commemorative half-dollar should net out to be much higher than it was back in 1946. "Making money" is still a great business to be in -- I wonder if they franchise?
Hope that answers your question!