Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Ken's Numismatic eBay Store US and World Coins, Bullion, and Exonumia. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!
Subscribe to our Youtube Channel! Check out our Pinterest!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

1884 Dokdo From Princely State Of Kutch. I Think

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Replies: 3 / Views: 108Next Topic  
New Member

United States
40 Posts
 Posted Yesterday   10:29 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add jdsstrat to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This one took a while to track down - as I have since learned is often the case with these Princely Indian State examples - but I think I finally did: It is a dokdo from the Princely State of Kutch from the year 1884. Then, of course, the doubts started creeping in. Compared to the other 1884s that I used to identify it, this one shined. Perhaps a little too shiny? I'm not even sure if replicas of this coin were ever minted. That said, I'd love to hear from the experts in this forum if they think my Kutch coin is genuine or not.



Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
Hondo Boguss's Avatar
United States
15731 Posts
 Posted Today  17H 25M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hondo Boguss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I believe that you have identified it correctly, jdsstrat. It may be shinier because it was cleaned - a not uncommon condition for coins of that era.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces41140.html
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
New Member
United States
40 Posts
 Posted Today  10H 33M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jdsstrat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you, Hondo. Yes, I saw that one and when you look close you'll notice subtle differences of the placement of the characters - same characters, slightly different placement. I am assuming that the Numista one being from 1883 and mine from 1884 may have had something to do with that. That and the fact that they were all handmade then, even different dies for the same coin/same year might account for the subtle differences. Would you agree?
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
Hondo Boguss's Avatar
United States
15731 Posts
 Posted Today  7H 32M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hondo Boguss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
That and the fact that they were all handmade then, even different dies for the same coin/same year might account for the subtle differences. Would you agree?

Yes, very much so. Besides placement, there can also be quite a bit of variability with character shapes. It confounded me when I first encountered coins from Kutch (and many other similar ones) but then came to the same realization as you.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
  Replies: 3 / Views: 108Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums